$1000 Bribe: Nigeria Football Coach Salisu Yusuf Suspended For One Year

Salisu Yusuf, the Super Eagles' Coach who was caught on camera collecting $1ooo bribe has been banned by the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF).

$1000 Bribe: Nigeria Football Coach Salisu Yusuf Suspended For One Year

Salisu Yusuf, the Super Eagles’ Coach who was caught on camera collecting $1ooo bribe has been banned by the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF).

Nigeria football coach Salisu Yusuf (1)
Nigeria football coach Salisu Yusuf (1)

The decision was reached after the committee on Ethics and Fair Play Chaired by Nuhu Ribadu adopted the report.

The committee placed a one-year ban from all football-related activities.

The coach corrupt practice was exposed by an undercover reporter, Ghanaian Aremeyaw Anas who posed as a player’s agent.

The undercover reporter used Tigers’ Player’s Agency as a cover and offer $1000 to Coach Yusuf on behalf of Players Osas Okoro and Rabiu Ali, for their inclusion in the list of players for 2018 CHAN Competition in Morroco.

After investigations and hearing the Coach’s side of the story, Ribadu Committee said it:

1) Established from the admission of Coach Salisu Yusuf and also found as a fact from the documentary and video evidence before it, that he accepted the cash gift of $1,000 offered by Tigers Player’s Agency, an undercover reporter, purportedly interested in acting on behalf of Players Osas Okoro and Rabiu Ali, for their inclusion in the list of players for 2018 CHAN Competition in Morocco.

Also Read:
Ribadu denies insulting Kwankwaso, Amaechi

2) The Committee found as a fact that it was not an error of judgment on the part of Coach Salisu Yusuf but a conscious and deliberate decision to have accepted the cash gift of $1,000 from the decoy player agent/undercover reporter, purportedly interested in acting on behalf of Players Osas Okoro and Rabiu Ali, even though the evidence before the Committee did not establish that his conduct influenced the choice of the two players.

3) That the two Players could have made the team to 2018 CHAN Competition in Morocco on the basis of their talent and performance.

4) That Coach Salisu Yusuf did not accept the offer of 15% of the anticipated transfer fees of the said players, as there was no follow –up action on the promise.

Also Read:
Mikel, Martins, Moses storm camp today

5) That the act of the Coach, which was widely published on the British Broadcasting Corporation, has a damaging effect on the reputation and integrity of Nigerian Football, as he ought to have conducted himself more professionally in line with the Code of Conduct signed alongside his Contract with the Nigeria Football Federation, as his conduct in public and in secret should be exemplary, since coaches are role models.

6) That the FIFA Code of Ethics, NFF Code of Ethics and FIFA Disciplinary Code, did not contemplate negligence or error of judgment as a defence to violation of any of the provisions as contained therein, as punitive measures must be adopted to serve as deterrent to other intending offenders, even though, that he is a first time offender.

On the committee’s decision, it stated that “In accordance with Art. 22, FIFA Disciplinary Code, he is hereby banned for the period of one year, from partaking or involvement or participation in any football related activity, effective from the date of this decision. He is also fined in the sum of $5,000 to be paid within three (3) months of the date of this decision…”

Also Read:
Why i abandoned my presidential ambition - Ribadu

The committee also ruled that an appeal against the decision can be made to the NFF Appeals Committee.

With Mainasara Illo (Member), Justin Okoroji (Member) and Joshua Onoja (Secretary) also present, the committee said it passed its verdict of guilt on the defendant based on “Art. 20, as well as Art. 21 (1) and 21 (3) of the NFF Code of Ethics. It also made reference to Art. 10 and 11 of the FIFA Code of Ethics.”

Article 20 states that “Persons bound by this Code may only offer or accept gifts or other benefits to and from persons within or outside NFF, or in conjunction with intermediaries or related parties as defined in this Code, which i) have symbolic or trivial value ii) exclude any influence for the execution or omission of an act that is related to their official activities or falls within their discretion iii) are not contrary to their duties iv) did not create any undue pecuniary or other advantage and v) did not create a conflict of interest.”

Also Read:
PDP candidate, Nuhu Ribadu calls opponent, concede defeat

Article 21 (1) states that: “Persons bound by this Code must not offer, promise, give or accept any personal or undue pecuniary advantage or other advantage in order to obtain or retain business or any other improper advantage to or from anyone within or outside NFF. Such acts are prohibited; regardless of whether carried out directly or indirectly through, or in conjunction with, intermediaries or related parties as defined in this Code. In particular, persons bound by this Code must not offer, promise, give or accept any undue pecuniary or other advance for the execution or omission of an act that is related to their official activities and is contrary to their duties or falls within their discretion. Any such offer must be reported to the Ethics Committee and any failure to do so shall be sanctionable in accordance with this Code.”

Also Read:
Breaking: Drogba announces retirement from international football

Article 21 (3) states that “Persons bound by this Code must refrain from any activity or behaviour that might give rise to the appearance or suspicion of improper conduct as described in the foregoing sections, or any attempt thereof.”

Before the committee’s sitting, the NFF Integrity Unit headed by Christian Emeruwa, which commenced preliminary investigation when the documentary was first made public, had already submitted a report to the NFF General Secretary based on its work.

Watch The Video Below:

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.